🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". The policy is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to enact a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," stated one parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after encountering disturbing platform posts contends that a simple age ban might not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for children," said a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the local government level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced laws mandating guardian approval for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain politicians to follow Australia's path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, further countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies adopt a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

While this international conversation unfolds, the actions of this nation and several other countries indicate that governments globally are no longer willing to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.